R. Y.
Why this founder surfaced, what the evidence supports today, and the next fact that would most reduce uncertainty.
Why is this person worth attention?
GitHub appeared here as a confirmation source keyed to the person — first-commit date, commit cadence, artifact existence. It did not discover him and it is never a discovery source.
Public code confirmed build cadence. GitHub was used as evidence, not as a popularity contest.
github personFounder signal 34.1 after access advantages are removed. The evidence is still early.
early-stage recordThere is not enough direct evidence yet to be highly confident. A wide range is more honest than a low score.
uncertainty stays visibleContact the founder with one specific question about the highest-impact missing evidence.
No opportunity opened yetDecision axesFounder, market and idea-versus-market stay separate
Founder
▬stable[-0.30, 0.19]·4ptsMarket
▲improving[0.14, 0.91]·4ptsCategorical on purpose. There is no number here to average with the other two axes.
Idea vs Market
?insufficient data·2ptsHow the estimate was formedCold-start prior, history and score definitions
Cold-start bench
How much is direct evidence, how much is a reference-class prior, and what would narrow the range.
No cold-start bench block for this person at this asof.
Founder score history
Append-only versions preserve the person’s record across ventures.
No score history at this snapshot.
Complete recordEvery remaining field, for auditability
- Person id
- per_ry
- Display name
- R. Y.
- Pseudonymized
- true
- Is real person
- true
- Refuter enabled
- false
- Provenance class
- live
- Contact status
- public_email
- Channels
- github_person
- First observed at
- 2026-07-09T17:33:00Z
- Sector
- ai_infra
- Founder type
- technical
- Deterministic only
- true
- Axes disagree
- false
- Note
- GitHub appeared here as a confirmation source keyed to the person — first-commit date, commit cadence, artifact existence. It did not discover him and it is never a discovery source.