Ledgerline
AUTHOREDinboundb2b fintech infraClaims to review — 17
Start with red contradictions and purple missing evidence. Click a row only when you want the receipt.
Founded June 2024; 18 months of work behind the product.
12 employees.
€41K MRR as of June 2026.
Cap table — expected at diligence stage, not disclosed.
Post-money valuation and instrument — not disclosed.
Why claims are kept separate
Trust is scored per claim, never per company. There is no company-level trust average in this system, because averaging a verified incorporation record against a contradicted revenue figure would destroy the only thing an investor needs to see.
6 verified + 6 unverified + 3 contradicted = 15 extracted. Plus 2 absent-but-expected added by the manifest = 17.How this opportunity surfacedOrigin, domain probe and process clock
First signal 12h ago · decision reached in 38 min · SLA met with 11.8h to spare
Source material and process historyThe input artifact and every stage transition
Source artifact — deck
Claims below were extracted from this file. Every one of them points back to a page and a region of it.
Stage timeline
Sourcing → Screening → Diligence → Decision. Where the clock stopped for a human is marked separately from where our compute was slow — they are four orders of magnitude apart.
- 1. Sourcingby applicant2026-07-18 14:03Zheld 0m→ advanced
Inbound. The sourcing stage is instantaneous by construction — the applicant sourced themselves. Zero days of edge, which is exactly what the Days of Edge table says about the Apply channel.
- 2. Screeningby systemscreen: pass2026-07-18 14:03Zheld 4m→ advanced
Passed all four screen rules: a product artifact exists, in thesis, not an excluded category, company identity present.
- 3. Diligenceby system2026-07-18 14:07Zheld 34m→ advanced
Manifest derived, 14 claims extracted, 47 verification fetches issued, three claims contradicted.
- 4. Decisionby systemterminal2026-07-18 14:41Zopen